A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated national focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a hugely publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of design operates at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their family dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, notably in a delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partly built, is in the correct position. Their authorized workforce has characterised the action as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding so as to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal arranging disputes, in which sights of The ocean are both very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic attempts from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In accordance with sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-large drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions, an image that has considering the fact that turn into emblematic from the depth with the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they were being intended to Obtain Visible evidence from the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Situations claimed, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the h2o through critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm h2o to photograph the internet site grew to become one of the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that such actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected in detail because of the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the history and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court listened to even more submissions on no matter if interim orders really should be granted to halt Irish Times article about René Collier development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial minute in the legal timeline.
For the Main of the dispute is usually a disagreement about boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep which the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has actually been described as meticulous in his evaluation of arranging paperwork, maps, and disorders hooked up to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to organizing law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting rather that it's about guaranteeing that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have explained their lengthy-standing relationship to the area as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple simply just looking to develop a loved ones home in accordance With all the law. They deny the wall encroaches with a Specific Area of Conservation and say that each one works are already carried out according to Experienced guidance and permitted strategies. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes moving into the sea all through a storm, do not change the underlying points.
The case has also raised broader questions about how planning disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over building of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for a predicament a large number of observers see as significantly popular. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation among personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Moments posting about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental issues, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Situations posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from really diverse Qualified backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are becoming synonymous While using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website through the sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical actuality with the coastline as well as the symbolic nature of the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an excessive tactic.
As the High Court proceedings keep on, the result remains uncertain. The court need to determine whether the wall as crafted complies with preparing authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. Nevertheless the human component remains central: neighbours who must Are living together with each other long once the authorized expenses have already been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation extend further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin in recent years.